Another World RTA change?
7 years ago
Massachusetts, USA

With the new rule change allowing people to do runs of world RTAs from completed files, a run I had completed of the world 1 RTA obliterated the past WR held by Auchgard by 41 seconds, although the run by Auchgard was far better and more optimized. Similar to how there is an option in the 3-4 IL to run with or without the switch, I am proposing that there be an option to specify whether you have completed the world RTA from either a completed or new file. This would be a fairly easy change to implement, and I feel that it would be more fair to those who have runs on new files. I would love to hear your responses!

Hampshire, England

^ i agree, i think i would give more depth to IL's

Washington, USA

Thank you Gix for recognizing that haha <3

The fact that the rules were changed should be controversy enough. So rather than combining everything, as a lot of us would prefer to run on new files, compared to running on completed files, and vise versa, I think the solution is to have those categories specified within the IW's section of the leaderboard.

Something like this: "Any% New" --- "100% New" --- "Any% Completed" --- "100% completed"

If that makes sense?

Or otherwise we could just move back to the old rules? :P

Washington, USA

I did take into consideration on both sides of the argument in that post.

Maybe I am willing to do that hard work. Saying I'm completely 100% alone is also a little unfair, as I might not be completely wrong. Yes I'm aware it was decided by the community.

I'm not saying it's definite that it has to happen. Saying my suggestion is "preposterous" is a bit on the mean side.

Honestly, I don't care if it happens or not. I'm just throwing my ideas out, which doesn't hurt at all, and that was kindof the original point of the post, right?

And the way you typed out everything made it sound like it was just to shoot me down.

I would like to ask kindly that you rephrase some things next time, as seeming like you're trying to tear me down is a way to get people to not want to run this game anymore, and be less of a part of the community, especially coming from a moderator.

I don't mind that you replied, it's just the way it was phrased could have been better.

Sincerely, LOE

Edited by the author 7 years ago
Game stats
Followers
3,101
Runs
7,657
Players
1,645
Latest threads
Posted 4 years ago
0 replies
Posted 4 years ago
0 replies
Posted 2 months ago
6 replies