Well I mean, It might just be pure coincidence. You both live in england, you made your account a few minutes after he removed his, and your name is "RandomNewSpeedrunner" It's only really natural that you are suspicious. I am not saying that it is you, but thats why you are suspected.
You may or may not be SMG69. You did, however, take one of AndrewG's old PBs and submit it as your own.
And also, I know of a runner who's first PB was a 5:06! (Youtube: Coleton Scandin). So I highly doubt this runner spliced his first run of a 5:07.
he probably deleted his account cause he was getting too many complaints about people thinking he's SMG69
He's obviously SMG69. But even if he wasn't (which he is), you heard Rupert JUST say that he submitted an old andrewg run as his own... How are people still defending him?
@Darpey Because people want to be seen "taking the high road" even when it's not warranted.
I'd rather be wrong and apologize when proven wrong (if it's at all worth it, depending on the case) than ignore the obvious that's laughing right at our collective faces.
Any% (NTSC) runs below 4:57.000 must now fulfill additional requirements in order to be verified.
- The run's full session must be included in the submission description.
- For emulator runs below 4:57.000, some form of input display must be visible for the duration of the run. A hand-cam or input
