Cave of Ordeals IL's
7 years ago
United States

Instead of Any% and 100%, shouldn't there be Any%, First Trip 100%, and Second Trip 100%?

Any% would be to simply get to F50 as fast as possible (using any tricks possible) and can use either enemy set. First Trip 100% must complete all the floors and obtain the three Poe Souls, and is done on the first enemy set. Second Trip 100% must complete all the floors, and is done on the second enemy set.

For runs that use the first enemy set, the dungeon must be untouched (i.e. the three poes still have to be there, and in 1st 100% have to be obtained), for runs using the second enemy set, you obviously have to beat the dungeon once to unlock it so it'd be not untouched by default. For 100% categories, the torch debug routine is banned; this trick being part of the reason for separating Any% from 100%

Thoughts?

Germany

Sadly you can only enter IL categories for all ILs together :/

United States

Shame, but nothing you can do about that then. Given that, what are the current rules for CoO Any% and CoO 100%, if there's a difference?

Mexico
Slevanas
She/Her, They/Them
7 years ago

Speaking of Cave of Ordeals, can we have Any% Glitchless and Any%? Simply because the Wii has an exclusive floor skip glitch, but Gamecube doesn't. So it's not fair to average around 24 minutes if you're really good and 8 minutes with the glitch.That is quite a difference and I think warrants for the runs to be separated into those two ways.

United States

I'd say it's better split by Any% and 100%; since GC effectively 100%'s the dungeon anyway while the Wii run certainly does not. And also, the glitch is exclusive to USA Wii 1.0 only; it does not work on any other version, of which Wii has a few. But I agree, this topic does need more discussion, which is why I'd submitted the run in the first place.

Game stats
Followers
1,601
Runs
2,434
Players
336
Latest threads
Posted 2 months ago
Posted 4 months ago
1 reply
Posted 6 months ago
2 replies
Posted 1 year ago
3 replies