Site Statistics 2017
7 years ago
Texas, USA

Don't be such a Steph, Steph.

But, yes, this is super excellent. Thanks for taking the time to put this together.

Edited by the author 6 years ago
ROMaster2 likes this
Gelderland, Netherlands

o shit sick im top 50

Zachoholic and ROMaster2 like this
United States

Because another ranking system has been getting more attention, despite using a poorer methodology, I made an ultra simplified version of mine. This one is easier to load and share: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lQLd5PoUJl8oAKpmxJc7eh-lMyOCzPC3rKcrOEf4P-k/edit?usp=sharing

Edited by the author 6 years ago
Tron_Javolta likes this
Valhalla

What are points A-D?

United States

I have them explained in comments if you hover over them. They're the same as the RankWeights in the master list.

Texas, USA

I don't think the comments are visible for anyone except those who can edit it; they're not popping up for me, anyway. Can you put the formulas in cells out to the side? I'd like to see the variations you use on the original RankWeights (and maybe see if I can find a way to modify it to catch people who try to "game the system". ( I won't mention any names because I wouldn't want to embarrass RacingMonster ) )

Edited by the author 6 years ago
United States

Points A and B gets the numbers from the positions of runs on leaderboards, while C and D includes obsolete runs. This gives runners who put a lot of effort into their game, despite the lack of runners, some additional points. It works all-around as well; SMS's Any% WR alone is just under Vallu and TGH.

Points A and C include all leaderboards, while B and D exclude individual levels, as well as full-game leaderboards that are under 5 minutes. This was added mainly because of a certain individual gaming the leaderboards with arbitrary runs, but also had better overall results.