Any% S&Q should have S&Qs
7 years ago
Poitou-Charentes, France

I am wondering everyone's opinion on this. I understand that people can submit no S&Q times to the S&Q category, but this is a bit of a cop-out to those who dedicate to S&Q runs. I am wondering what everyone's thoughts would be to S&Q requiring at least 1 S&Q.

Edited by the author 7 years ago
Warr90 likes this
England

I agree mate.

Always thought it was a cop-out as you put it.

It's kinda like running Legacy% and submitting that for every category we have... (Except hundo duhh)

Bretagne, France

Well... thing is it is not really called any% S+Q, but any% no WW no OOB - and that's it!

If someone has a better time in noSQ, I don't see any reason not to accept it. It is as if you were not to accept any form of route in any%, as the 'any' clearly indicates that it's as you wish.

If someone has a faster run without SQing, well, that's a problem for the SQ runners to resolve in my opinion.

Then if you want to add a SQ restriction to it, well we have to change the name and clearly put "with SQs" where it is said in the rules at least one SQ is mandatory.

Edited by the author 7 years ago
Ontario, Canada

While it seems silly to have to specify a rule like "at least one SQ necessary", it seems sillier to me to have overlapping categories.

Québec

rules wont change, having a rule like "must do at least 1 s+q" is just stupid imo.

dragonc0 and Hearn like this
Ontario, Canada

i will submit sqwoob pb as any% and finally have a time in all cats

Spiraster and Warr90 like this
Game stats
Followers
635
Runs
1,471
Players
267
Latest threads
Posted 5 years ago
4 replies
Posted 7 years ago
0 replies
Posted 8 months ago
4 replies
Posted 9 months ago
2 replies
Posted 1 year ago
1 reply
Posted 1 year ago