So far, we have seen no proof for cheating, and only the mods falsely accusing of cheating. If they do not and/or cant provide proof, they cant reject it. These mods do not deserve their position. Anyway, you shpuld not let them ruin your fun or give them the pleasure of hurting you. I recommend to do what FurryWulfz said. Also, if any of the involved mods read this, I will demand you to show the evidence. Evidence is everything, and the most important in this case.
I just realized you and Kenan have matching colors for your names, is that on purpose?
Just a note about your SDA comment - many old runs that ended up on SDA were later determined to be spliced. Most notably is multiple runs from Zelda runner TSA. So, no, SDA didn't ensure uncheated runs, but like this site and others, when they figured out a run was cheated it was removed if it was still posted.
only thing I can imagine what Drakodan meant by this is that you seem to draw drama to you at a higher rate than other individuals. but that's just a theorizing, a src community theorizing!
I just think it's dumb how a pc player can reject console runs. It really doesn't make any sense. We need a console player moderator. Pc players don't know what it's like to play console.
It doesn't matter what you do to prove your self that you are not cheating. Klooger makes up his mind and he doesn't change. He needs to except the fact that some people are better than others.
It would be kinda hard to cheat without showing it onscreen. You can't cheat on Xbox unless you have an rgh/jtag same thing goes for jail broken PS3. Klooger is dumb.
It is about the vaguest question I've ever heard, but if I may, I believe what Drakodan might have meant was something more along the lines of "why do your posts usually involve drama of some kind?"