I don't like this retexture
Deleted
2 years ago

The changes from this update are too big to reduce to a simple like/don't like imo. There's much to like, and some real headscratchers.

Ivory, TRLittleToaster and 4 others like this
Rhode Island, USA

@Bob-chicken It would've been fine without the "I demand it"

Östergötland, Sweden

Nice one, change the layout to fit more ads 👍

Jubilee, Poefred and 5 others like this
Ohio, USA

Another site updates with a messy, awful layout that makes it more difficult to navigate or find important information, and more than likely another admin team just ignores it and keeps it I guess, but for me hiding categories and moderators being clear at the bottom are top of the list of problems, awful font with lack of casing for titles and categories, and a lot of smaller fonts are a major secondary problems. The WR history graph is a cool idea though at least

Argentina

[quote=chaos42666]The WR history graph is a cool idea though at least[/quote]

That already existed prior to this update, inside the Statistics page for each leaderboard.

Baldic, discranola and 3 others like this
Finland

retexture is an interesting choice of a word for redesign

Walgrey likes this
Germany

They most likely won't do that since supporting two designs of the website adds a lot of extra development time, especially when new features are added.

Walgrey and MrMonsh like this
Madrid, Spain

You should get used to it instead of expecting elo to react, I dont think that elo would go back to the old setup after all of the changes they have made.

Washington, USA

The compactness of the /runsawaitingverification is much better compared to the mod hub. You can much more easily scan most of the runs in the verification queue. The problem for me isn't how it looks, but how functionally it doesn't work as a moderator. I really wish there was a more compact modhub view or checking verification didn't automatically put me to the /modhub link.