Rejected
5 years ago
Lower Saxony, Germany

My run was rejected, because there isnt a video. The run is 14:25, so not sub 12 why the reject? Its Ok I will have a video next time, but if my PB gets better, i dont know. If i need a videoproof for 14 min runs, pls add it to the rules.

Ohio, USA

It was probably rejected because anyone can just lie and say they had a time, and since it was close to sub 12, they may have hesitated a little. Im not sayong youre lying, all im saying is there are people who lie about runs for no reason

Lower Saxony, Germany

OK, I understand. I hope people see this and always record there runs.

Canada

14:26 isn't even top 200, either the rules should reflect that you need a video, or the text saying you don't should be removed/changed to reflect whatever the actual rule is (ie no video if over 15m, or no video if you've got a similar time already, or no video need if post 12m if it's not your first run submitted, etc)

Lower Saxony, Germany

Its ok guys i got a much better PB with a video. It tooks so many attempts but it was worth. Don't discuss to much its happened but I hope the other runners run above min 12 are now allowed, without a video

Minnesota, USA

Sorry I been quiet in this thread. This was a fault on me, I'm use to rejecting runs without video proof from other games that I mod. Sorry about that mix up, Wasserkrieger.

As a few of you mentioned above the rules should be reflected for that change. We agree and have made changes to the rule set for Kirby's Dream Land. This really shouldn't impact any one wanting to run the game. It just adds more clarity to what will be accepted, etc, etc.

https://www.speedrun.com/kdl/thread/dc8ni/1#kehee

Lower Saxony, Germany

Thanks, it happened more than i thought.

Edited by the author 5 years ago