@CriscoWild The complaint wasn't about getting rid of inactive moderators in general. It was about getting rid of inactive moderators while there was an active moderator for the game, this moderator didn't request the removal themselves, the inactive moderators were available through social media, and the whole process happened because a random person applied for moderation on the grounds of no active moderators (which was not the case).

@Oreo321 I'm aware. My opinion remains unchanged.

Inactive mods should be removed regardless of how many other active mods may currently exist on any given board. It'd be courteous to consult those active mods about it and let them be the ones to handle it, but that's how it ought to be handled either way. I think at the very least, a moderator should be logging in every two weeks to check for new runs or forum posts. In the event that a person is gone for three months or two years, I don't personally understand a viewpoint suggesting that person is entitled to stay on as a moderator.

[quote]So this is potentially just a case of a mod jumping the gun a little too quickly, or something else and we simply don't have the full details.[/quote] I got a hold of them. It was an ELO Staff member that I guess is also a full mod? They just recited the policy to remove inactive mods if someone requests mod. I didn't push them really on whether or not I think that's wrong.

Once again the issue isn't whether or not inactive mods got removed. It's the process at which they were removed.