Adding yet another site i have to visit regular is not an option. All my arguments to have a leaderboard here are on the table and all my arguments are being ignored. I now even offer that if you make me a mod here that i will make that Level-leaderboard and verify all runs which will be posted for it and only that runs, view it as a limited mod. I will take all workload from your shoulders.No one would be less happy, have more work or something negative, maybe a few notifications more, but that isnt that bad and probably can be turned off in the settings somewhere. And some people would be happier after that. In the end it is a not loose - win situation. But something is telling me that isnt gonna happen, because some people have something personal against level-Leaderboards and people like me have to suffer because off them. Please show me that i am wrong with that.
"all my arguments are being ignored" They were not ignored, they were considered then denied.
"I now even offer that if you make me a mod here" lmao nice meme
"something is telling me that isnt gonna happen" oh really ?
"some people have something personal against level-Leaderboards" that's true.
"people like me have to suffer because off them." No, not at all, I don't know who you are and I don't like that other people suffer, but we considered your ideas as if it was anyone else.
I like how the only reason this argument is still going on is because you don't want to have to go to another site in order to see your times boarded. I don't see any other reason other than the idea that "Having multiple places is stupid" for this argument being continued, and I think that's funny tbh
Also from your original aversion and misunderstanding of my argument about the "score" I can tell you haven't actually even looked into the site yet, and probably just took a quick glance and assumed how it did everything. Maybe I should have used the word "ranking" or "aggregation"?
can it really be so bad clicking in the adress felt and click b then enter and see if any new wrs have come, and if we theorice a il leaderboard in here it's sometimes going to take days before the run is verified because no mod is active.
As a side note the energi you have put into trying to make this a thing is enough energi to use another side for decades
@DaFatMan922 no, but i still havent changed my opinion at all. Atleast many other games have IL/Chapter Leaderboards, which prove how usefull they are btw ,so it isnt a big loss if you look at the bigger picture. But still a loss i am sad about.
K. I'll just remind once again that the reason we use iVerb's board is because 1. srcom failed in the past and 2. It connects to steam so no matter what iverb's board functions better than srcom (It also has more features that srcom wouldn't be able to do at all), with the only major drawback being that it's on another site.
Hey Racingmonster! Iverbs leaderboards actually have a cool feature where you can submit times manually. This can be done with using a youtube video as proof for your run.
You can do this by going to your profile on http://board.iverb.me , logging in, and finding the desired chamber you want to submit a time for.
Then hover your cursor over that chamber and click the arrow you see here (
)
This will bring up a menu of a changelog for your times in that chamber, however we want to click the "create new submission" button. (
)
Now enter your time and put in the run's youtube link for proof and hit "submit score" (
)
This might be a hassle for EVERY single run of yours, but if we were to have an IL leaderboard here, you would need a youtube video for proof regardless.
Hope you see you on the boards!
From now on, for top 50 times, both partners must submit their demos. As such, it will also be required for to submit any .vpks that are used during the runs. If you have any questions, you can join our discord @ discord.gg/p2sr or you can create a forum post here.
The rules site has also gotten
