i dont really get what you mean with this, why reject a run if it is a pb, i mean if you pb then that run is after you last pb... or am i missing something here

He means , reject times that are worse than your pb and got submitted later than the actually pb. Can be for example pbs for different versions in this game because a pb is a pb , doesn´t matter on which version you got it. i don´t say anything to the topic , just for clarification because i understand fully what he means.

I think there should be a pal leaderboard so not everyone from europe or austrailia has to buy an NTSC Console.

I think there shouldn't be

Why not? You already bought an NTSC console?

If there was a PAL leaderboard, the record would be around 1 hour after a very short time, which would be just as impressive as 50 min on NTSC, so you coudn´t get famous for no reason. Now everyone who has a good pal pb gets an NTSC console sooner or later, so its very easy to get the best pal time on the actual leaderboard. I play on VC, so I´m not looking for an advantage, but I think that would be the best to avoid this conflict.

Imagine anyone grinding out a 50 caliber run on PAL.

I belive PAL might be very interesting cause it feels like slowmotion after playing NTSC, so you can be even more precise.